Introduction

In engineering and manufacturing, the use of standardized material codes is critical to ensuring consistency, quality, and safety. These codes serve as a universal language for identifying materials based on their composition, properties, and intended applications. 

However, material codes are not globally uniform — different countries and standards organizations use their own naming systems, which can lead to confusion or mismatches when working across borders. Understanding these differences is essential, especially in today’s global supply chain environment, where materials are often sourced internationally.

What are material codes?

Source


What may be known as A36 steel in the United States could be labeled differently elsewhere. Material codes are standardized designations assigned to materials to define their composition, properties, and suitability for specific applications. These codes are typically found in engineering drawings, technical datasheets, and bills of materials (BOMs). They help engineers, fabricators, and procurement teams communicate clearly about material requirements without ambiguity. 

For example, stainless steel grade “304” implies a certain level of corrosion resistance and chromium-nickel content, while “6061-T6” aluminum refers to an alloy with heat treatment that enhances strength. Accurate interpretation of these codes ensures the right material is used for the right purpose.

Overview of common International Material Standards

Material standards are developed by various organizations around the world to ensure consistency, quality, and safety in engineering and manufacturing. In the United States, ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) and SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) are widely used for metals, especially in construction and automotive industries. DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung) is Germany’s standardization body, while EN (European Norm) represents harmonized standards across Europe. 

JIS (Japanese Industrial Standards) governs materials and manufacturing in Japan, especially for precision components and electronics. Meanwhile, ISO (International Organization for Standardization) aims to unify standards globally, although many industries still rely on their national systems. 

Each of these organizations has developed its own material coding systems based on regional needs, testing practices, and historical development.

Source

Different codes for the same material in different countries
Source

Although materials may have identical or very similar properties, the codes used to identify them can differ significantly depending on the country or standards organization. For example, a common structural steel is designated as A36 in the ASTM (USA) system, S235JR under the EN (European) standard, and SS400 in the Japanese JIS system. 

While these materials serve similar functions, the naming conventions, classification methods, and property tolerances vary between standards. This variation can lead to confusion or mismatches if proper cross-referencing isn’t done, making it essential for engineers and procurement teams to understand these differences when working with international specifications.

Comparison Table of Common Materials
Material ASTM / SAE (USA) DIN / EN (Europe) JIS (Japan) Remarks
Aluminum 5052 5052 EN AW-5052 A5052
(JIS H4000)
Excellent corrosion resistance
Aluminum 6061-T6 6061-T6 EN AW-6061 A6061
(JIS H4000)
High-strength aluminium, good machinability and weldability
Stainless Steel 316/316L 316/316L 1.4404 SUS316 Excellent corrosion resistance, suitable for marine and chemical applications
Stainless Steel 304 304 1.4301 SUS304 General-purpose stainless steel with good corrosion resistance
Mild Steel A36 A36 S235J2(/R) SS400 Standard structural steel with good weldability and strength
Brass C360 C360 CuZn36Pb3 C3601 Free-machining brass used for precision components

Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 Source 4

Conclusion

Regional differences in material codes can easily lead to misunderstandings if not properly accounted for, especially when working with global suppliers. At Factorem, where we manage diverse sourcing requests across various manufacturing standards, it’s important to ensure materials are clearly specified and properly cross-referenced. 

Source

By maintaining clear technical documentation and communicating closely with suppliers, we reduce the risk of mismatched materials and production delays. As international collaboration becomes more common, being aware of these code variations is not just helpful — it's essential for delivering consistent, high-quality outcomes.

Working across borders shouldn’t mean compromising on material clarity. At Factorem, we bridge the gap between international standards and real-world manufacturing by helping you source the right materials with the correct specifications, no matter the code. Tap into our global supplier network and ensure your parts meet every technical requirement. Get started with a quote today and manufacture with confidence.